Need an argumentative essay on Couple of Questions to answer. two paragraphs for each. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.
The shifting of power over finance from king to parliament was one of the central factors that helped in the steady extension of political liberties. Power shifted from the king to those who possessed money, but economic and political benefits were not spread uniformly to sections of the society”. (Democracy)
The preliminary duty of a criminal justice system in any parliamentary democracy is to protect life and property of its citizens.
It should maintain the law and order of the country. Any intrusion from inside or outside should be tackled by the criminal justice system. The culprits must be produced to the court and the court will take necessary actions against the culprits if they found guilty of doing the crime.
Harvard Law Review in 1949. The fictitious case revolves around explorers who cannibalize a member of their team and the five Supreme Court judges who provide opinions on what should be done with them” (The Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New Opinions) Even though the members of the explorer team did this crime in order to survive, it cannot be justified since nobody have the right to take life since they cannot give it back. This crime can be justified up to certain extent as per law since no other options were left for them and moreover they have taken the opinions of others before committing the crime. But morally their crime is not justifiable. Law and morality have a definite relationship.
It is difficult for the street patrol police to do the civil order policing. The psychology of the mob will be different and hence specially trained police is required to control them. Force may not be a good weapon in controlling the agitations from the mob. Only a psychological approach can be a useful one dealing with the public protests. Street patrol police are usually trained to deal with criminal groups of smaller number. So they